From The National Access Network
at Teachers College, Columbia University
July 1, 2009

In this issue...

U.S. Supreme Court Remands Arizona ELL Funding Case for Further Hearings

Campaign for Educational Equity Announces "Stimulating Equity?" Project

Stanford Study Offers Mixed Appraisal of Charters


Litigation Page
Click here for updates on recent litigation and the status of the adequacy movement

U.S. SUPREME COURT REMANDS ARIZONA ELL FUNDING CASE FOR FURTHER HEARINGS
REJECTS CLAIM THAT FEDERAL COURTS LACK AUTHORITY TO ORDER STATE LEGISLATURES TO INCREASE EDUCATION FUNDING


In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court last week sent back for further hearings an Arizona English language learner funding case that has been pending in the federal courts for the past nine years. In Horne v. Flores, the high court majority reversed a decision of U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that had upheld a district court order finding the state in contempt for failing to follow the court’s previous orders to “establish a funding system that rationally related funding available to the actual costs of all elements of ELL instruction.” The dissenters would have upheld the lower court orders without any further hearings.
Read Full Story

Campaign for Educational Equity Announces “Stimulating Equity?” Project

The Campaign for Educational Equity at Teachers College, Columbia University recently launched an in-depth research effort to evaluate the impact of the ARRA on state education systems around the country.

Read Full Story


Stanford Study Offers Mixed Appraisal of Charters

Multiple Choice: Charter School Performance in 16 States,” a report released last month, presents a mixed portrait of charter school effectiveness. According to researchers at the Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) at Stanford University, charter students nationwide experience statistically significant, slightly smaller learning gains in math and reading than traditional public school pupils with similar demographic characteristics. The data show that approximately 80% of the charters assessed perform significantly worse or no better than their conventional counterparts. The study, however, also identifies subgroups of students that are likely to fare far better in charters and recognizes several high-achieving states.
Read Full Story

 
© 2008 Access Network, 525 West 120th St, Box 219, NY NY 10027
Tel: (212) 678-3291 | Fax: (212) 678-8364 | Email: schoolfunding@tc.edu
http://www.schoolfunding.info