Arkansas Fact Sheet
Background
Related
News
State Funding Context
Total Number of Students, 2001-2002: 449,805
Total Public School Expenditures, 2000-2001: $2,505,279,000
Average Per-Pupil Expenditures, 2000-2001: $5,568
% Eligible for Free/Reduced Lunch: 47.2%
% in limited-English-proficiency programs, 2001-2002:
2.9%
| Study Title: |
"An
Evidence-Based Approach to School Finance Adequacy
in Arkansas" |
| |
|
| Date Completed: |
September 2003 |
| |
|
| Calculated Base Costs: |
The study created an evidence-based
matrix describing the resources each school needs
to provide students with an adequate education.
The matrix includes adjustments for students living
in poverty and for English language learners. The
authors also recommend a substantial increase in
teachers' salaries. The cost of implementing the
matrix and salary increases varies by district,
with a mean of $6,230 per pupil in 2003 dollars. |
| |
|
| Major Recommendations: |
Increase school funding by $848.3 million, an
increase of about 34%, including:
$224.6 million to implement evidence-based resource
matrix
$356 million to increase teacher salaries
$100 million to create expanded preschool programs
for all students age 3 and 4 from families with
an income at or below 200 percent of the poverty
level
$167.7 to create a needs-based financing formula
wherein state funds supplement local property
tax revenues as needed to fully implement the
resource matrix and raise teacher salaries
Reform the teacher pay schedule by:
Implementing a performance-based pay system
that awards salary increases to teachers who
master instructional skills proven to increase
student achievement.
Using "adders" to attract teachers
to certain geographic areas and for teachers
in shortage areas, such as mathematics and science.
Phase in program over a period not to exceed
two biennia, making allowances for inflation
|
| |
|
| Special Features of the Study: |
The study's recommended resource matrices are
based on "effective school" models that
are focused on improving instruction through professional
development and a performance pay structure. The
authors recommend significantly restructuring
schools and reallocating resources to implement
the models on which the figures are based.
The study emphasizes the importance of preschool,
recommending an expanded pre-kindergarten program
for low-income families, full-day kindergarten,
and class sizes of 15 in grades K-3.
In determining appropriate levels of teacher pay,
the researchers considered the geographic cost-of-education
index, as well as salary benchmarks in competing
states and industries.
The authors based the resource matrices on a school
size of 500 students, for elementary, middle,
and secondary schools, despite the fact that most
Arkansas schools are smaller than this.
|
| |
|
| Implementation: |
After the state missed the January 2004 deadline
for compliance with the Lakeview
School District v. Huckabee
decision, the court appointed
special masters to evaluate the state's progress.
The legislature, then in special session, acted
quickly to pass education legislation addressing
some of the costing-out report's recommendations.
Measures passed include:
A new school funding formula designed to comply
with at least some court mandates
An increase in state sales tax to raise revenue
for schools
A raise in minimum teacher salaries from $21,680/year
to $27,500/year
$40 million in funding for preschool programs
for next year
Additional accountability measures for schools
$10 million to assess building needs
In their report,
the special masters applauded the state's progress,
but also noted that it didn't fully follow the
costing-out report's recommendations. The legislature
failed to implement:
A reduction in class size to 15 in grades K-3
A 10% across-the-board teacher pay increase
$100 million for preschool programs over the
next two years
|
| |
|
| Methodology: |
Effective
Strategies |
| |
The Arkansas Joint Legislative Committee on Educational
Adequacy, formed in response to the state Supreme
Court's decision in Lakeview v. State,
contracted for research and consulting services
with school finance experts to recommend a set
of prototypical school models. The Joint Committee
defined an "adequate education" as one
meeting the state's current curriculum frameworks
and testing system.
Used recent research on the links between various
school resources and structural features and
school performance.
Synthesized the findings of professional judgment
panels in 5 other states, paying close attention
to recommended numbers of faculty and staff.
Developed three prototypical schools and grade
configurations to provide models for the resource
matrices, including a K-5 elementary school,
a 6-8 middle school, and a 9-12 high school,
all with 500 students.
Researchers supplemented the effective strategies
approach with a quasi-professional judgment
approach. They convened 2 professional judgment
panels made up of 70 leading Arkansas educators,
who reviewed the Joint Committee's resource
matrices and made recommendations pertaining
to class size, faculty and staff, and pro-ration
of resources for schools significantly smaller
or larger than the model schools.
|
| |
|
| Additional Factors: |
The study does not take into account
facilities, food service, or transportation. The
study does take into account extensive professional
development and increased planning and preparation
time for teachers. |
| |
|
| Public Input: |
None |
| |
|
| Prepared for: |
Arkansas Joint Committee on Educational
Adequacy |
| |
|
| Prepared by: |
Lawrence O. Picus and Associates |
|